Posting Tools

Related Reading

Heat: How to Stop the Planet Burning
By George Monbiot
(Allen Lane £9.75)

Monarchy: From the Middle Ages to Modernity
By David Starkey
(HarperPress £11.04)

Having It So Good: Britain in the Fifties
By Peter Hennessy
(Allen Lane £17.61)

October 28, 2006 11:11 PM

If methadone approach isn’t working, why not change the policy?

What we think

STUDIES have shown that most drug users seek help with the aim of eventually beating their addiction. Yet new research has revealed that only 4% of heroin addicts in Scotland who were prescribed methadone managed to become drug free nearly three years after beginning their treatment.

The findings have once again cast doubt on the effectiveness of the methadone programme north of the Border. Critics say that from far from being part of the solution, methadone is now a large part of the problem.

Those who advocate the use of the substitute heroin point out that it can help reduce deaths, bring stability to chaotic lifestyles and cut crime. And clearly it can play a role in tackling drug problems. But if 20,000 Scots are being prescribed methadone with little prospect of recovery, questions have to be asked over who is benefiting from this approach.

The same research also found residential rehabilitation services had a far higher success rate, with almost 30% of addicts who underwent this treatment becoming drug free. However, many people in Scotland are unable to readily get this kind of help. Currently, only one in 50 drug addicts can access these services and recent figures show that more than 800 people are waiting for this type of treatment on the NHS.

Professor Neil McKeganey, who carried out the research, also makes the point that methadone is being used with far greater success south of the Border. Similar studies carried out in England show that 25% of addicts who are given methadone there are drug free after two years. Why are services in Scotland, therefore, failing to produce similar results?

It is clear that there are many questions which have to be answered over the methadone programme in Scotland. Yet the Scottish Executive’s response to the research has only been to call for an end to what it calls an “unhelpful obsession” of trying to find out which is the best approach for treating drug addicts. It dismisses studies which show better outcomes for residential drug rehabilitation services than community-based ones, as “not comparing like with like”.

Meanwhile, the numbers of prescriptions being handed out for methadone continues to rise, at a cost to the NHS of nearly £13 million every year. Hundreds of addicts continue to die, with 264 drug-related deaths recorded in 2005. There will be no single, easy solution to how best to treat Scotland’s estimated 50,000 drug addicts. But whether we need more investment in rehabilitation services, a change in the use of methadone to ensure there is some prospect of recovery or an entirely different approach altogether, surely it is a debate that we must have.

Comments (3)

Methadone treatment is not and never has been intended as a cure for opioid addiction. It is a medication to treat and control a chronic and largely uncureable condition. Simply being abstinent from drugs does not mean a person is cured. They may still live with cravings, depression, lethargy, etc. This is due to the biochemical occurances within the endorphin systems of long term opioid addicts. Long term opioid use causes derangements in the production of natural opiates(ENDORPHINS) that keep us all feeling normal levels of happiness and contentment, and control minor aches and pains. Even with years of abstinence, some users will never experience a return to normal endorphin function. These people require exogenous opioid supplementation to feel normal--not high, just normal. Methadone is best suited to this due to it's long half life, lack of euphoric side effects, very slow rate of tolerance building. and low cost. It is a very safe drug to take physically speaking. The founders of MMT, Dr.'s Dole and Nyswander, knew and expected from the outset that many patients would require life long maintenance on this drug. Yes, methadone IS a substitute, but NOT for heroin, etc--it is a substitute for the endorphins the addicts brain no longer makes. No amount of residential rehab, prayer, meditation, and step working will cure this biochemical, medical disease in these people. Short term addicts may benefit from such therapy, but most long term, heavy users will not do well there. Many of these addicts were actually BORN with a malfunctioning endorphin system, struggled all their lives with depression and misery, and in seeking a cure stumbled into opiates and finally felt normal. For these folks, even if a return to normal function IS possible with abstinence, normal for them is still pretty awful. They too need opioid supplementation. Standard anti depressants are not effective for endorphin deficiencies--they work on serotonin.

The fact is that for those who remain in treatment on MMT, the success rate, as measured by a return to a productive life, employment, and not using illicit drugs, is about 65%. Those who taper off MMT have a relapse rate approaching 90%. Please remember this is a chronic medical condition, and as such, requires chronic therapy for some people. The goal of insulin therapy is not to wean diabetics off insulin, and no one judges it's success by seeing how many diabetics are "insulin free" in 3 years. This is just as ludicrous.

First thing to say is that there is no cure for addiction! To give addicts the false hope of a cure is cruel, dis-honest and irresponsible.
In saying this I certainly am not a bringer of doom and fatalism. People do recover and lead normal and productive lives "if they have the capacity to be honest themselves". Methadone simply postpones the chances of people being honest with themselves, like telling an alcoholic that if he/she only has a couple of drinks every now and then he/she will be fine.
Coming off drugs in a controlled enviroment such a rehabilitation hospital is not easy but it is manageable. Nobody, unlike alcohol, dies from the withdrawl from drugs if it is done in a protected enviroment. The way forward from there is again not easy but it is attainable and many people have acheived it. There is hope but only if it is a realistic and honest one, not a false horizon such as given by methodone.
One last point. To try and compare diabetics and their use of insulin with the use of methadone is both erroneous in the extreme and again completely dis-honest

It is most certainly NOT "erroneous". Addiction is a disease of the brain chemistry. Diabetes id a disease of the body chemistry. Addict's brain's do not produce adequate endorphins at a normal level. Diabetic's pancreases do not produce insulin at a normal level. Some diabetics require insulin therapy to restore the chemistry to normal. Some addicts require exogenous opiates (methadone) to restore the brain's chemistry to normal. Diabetics on insulin need their medication daily or they will become quite ill. Endorphin deficient patients need their medication daily or they will become quite ill. Why is that "erroneous"?

Post a comment

I have read and accept the Terms & Conditions

0309QualityRedefined.jpg

Advertising

Technorati

Technorati search

Site Information